06-24-2024 06:25 PM - edited 07-12-2024 02:04 PM
Note: These materials were prepared by Pledge 1% and its legal counsel, but these materials do not constitute legal advice. When choosing a philanthropic partner that will receive, manage and distribute your funds when your equity pledge is executed, we suggest that you review the considerations described in the chart below and consult with your legal counsel.
There are 4 common vehicles for managing the proceeds from your equity donation:
Donor Advised Fund (DAF) |
Nonprofit Corp - Public Charity |
Nonprofit Corp - Private Foundation |
Fiscally Sponsored Project |
Company funds a donor advised fund (“DAF”), the “Company X Fund” at a large, existing nonprofit corporation that is tax-exempt under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) and that is “public charity.” An example would be the Tides Foundation. |
Company sets up a new nonprofit corporation and applies for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3). Company intends to fundraise and ensure that the new nonprofit receives at least one-third of its support, over time, from a wide-variety of donors -- not just the Company and its key officers and shareholders. |
Company sets up a new nonprofit corporation and applies for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3). Company does not intend to fundraise, and the new entity will be a private foundation. |
Company sets up a fiscally sponsored project at an existing 501(c)(3) public charity, like the Tides Center. |
And four common considerations when choosing a philanthropic partner including: What do you want the recipient charity to do with the donation? How much control and flexibility do you want? Do you want to fundraise from outside of the corporation? And are there other tax considerations?
|
DAF |
Nonprofit Corp - Public Charity |
Nonprofit Corp - Private Foundation |
Fiscally sponsored project |
I. Activities -- What do you want to do with the donations |
||||
Domestic grants to charities |
Easiest solution if this all you want to do |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Not typical |
Grants to individuals and scholarships |
Not allowed (with limited exceptions) |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity and requires IRS pre-approval of process |
Not typical |
Foreign grants |
Allowed with extra expenditure responsibility requirements or an opinion of foreign public charity equivalence |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity AND extra expenditure responsibility requirements or an opinion of foreign public charity equivalence |
Not typical |
Matching grants to charities |
Yes |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Yes -- but requires maintaining and operating a legal entity |
Not typical |
Direct charitable programs Investment in a for profit social enterprise Recruiting fee if hire candidates sourced by social enterprise |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Good vehicle if you don’t want to operate your own legal entity but want to do programs not just grants and are willing to cede control to sponsor organization |
Event sponsorship |
Can sponsor events, but avoid any benefits to donors, such as tickets or tables at meals |
Yes, but any benefits, such as tickets or tables at meals, should be treated as an asset of the charity |
Can sponsor events, but any benefits, such as tickets or tables at meals should only be used by Foundation officers, directors, staff, and volunteers |
Yes |
II. Control: How much control and flexibility do you want? |
||||
Level of control |
You advise on grants, but do not control |
Company can appoint and remove board of charity and effectively control -- outside donors may be reluctant to donate to company controlled entity without outside directors |
Company can appoint and remove board of charity and effectively control -- most control |
Sponsor has ultimate control, but Company has some control via fiscal sponsorship contract |
Flexibility to move funds |
Company can usually move funds to a different DAF sponsor or to a controlled public charity, but not to a private foundation |
Funds can be moved to a DAF, another charity, or a private foundation |
Funds can be moved to a DAF, another charity, or, with a bit more difficulty, to another private foundation |
Funds can be moved, via contract, to another public charity, private foundation, or DAF |
III. Sources of Funding: Do you want to fundraise from outside of the corporation? |
||||
Company as donor or C-Suite Executives and shareholders as donors |
Easy vehicle for this |
Works well, assuming charity can satisfy the 1/3 public support test by having other donors as well |
Yes, but Company should donate stock or cash, not warrants as the exercise of the warrants may be self-dealing |
Yes, good vehicle for giving if the vehicle otherwise makes sense for activities |
Fundraising from individuals |
Yes, but individuals may be reluctant to give to company branded DAF; normally only works if the gift is unrestricted as to purpose |
Yes, good option for this |
Individuals can, but normally will not, give to a private company foundation |
Yes, good vehicle for giving if the vehicle otherwise makes sense for activities |
Fundraising from other DAFS and private foundations |
Yes |
Yes |
Does not work well |
Yes |
IV. Taxes |
||||
Company contributes its own shares |
Deductible at fair market value (see note below on valuation) and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Deductible at fair market value (see note below on valuation) and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Deductible at fair market value (see note below on valuation) and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Deductible at fair market value (see note below on valuation) and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Company contributes warrants in company |
Deductible at fair market value when exercised and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Deductible at fair market value when exercised and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Should not be donated because of the self-dealing rules |
Deductible at fair market value when exercised and against up to 10% of Company’s net income |
Individual contributes company shares |
Deductible at fair market value. (see note below on valuation) and against up to 30% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible at fair market value. (see note below on valuation) and against up to 30% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible at fair market value only if publicly traded stock subject to no restrictions and against up to 20% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible at fair market value. (see note below on valuation) and against up to 30% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Individual contributes cash |
Deductible against up to 60% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible against up to 60% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible against up to 30% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
Deductible against up to 60% of the donor’s AGI (taking into account other donations during the year as well) |
V. Other Considerations |
||||
Costs/Fees |
DAF usually takes a 1% administrative fee |
Separate legal entity requires startup costs of approximately $20,000 plus ongoing legal, accounting, and staffing |
Separate legal entity requires startup costs of approximately $20,000 plus ongoing legal, accounting, and staffing |
Fiscal sponsors typically take a fee of between 5% and 15% on property and money donated to project |
Staffing |
Company may not pay staff or consultants through a DAF |
Typically public charity has its own staff, but Company can make a grant to pay staff |
Company can pay to staff the separate entity with its own employees, separate employees, or some combination. Often, a Company will staff at its own expense so that its employees can get company benefits and stock options |
Company provides the staff; can pay its own staff or can have staff become staff of the project sponsor and pay from project funds |
Time efficiency |
Very efficient; minimal admin; can be more time consuming for non-traditional grants |
Efficient because of control, but admin takes time |
Efficient because of complete control, but similar to DAF for international gifts |
Efficient for direct programs |
Branding |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Subscribe to our Pledge 1% Member Updates Forum and keep up on the latest conversations, tips and resources shared by social impact experts around the world.
You've Been Subscribed
COPYRIGHT 2021 PLEDGE 1% ALL RIGHTS RESERVED